TI-M抗议特赦纳吉,破坏反贪公信并摧毁国誉
国家元首依布拉欣特赦前首相纳吉,准其缴清5000万令吉罚款后居家服刑,招致大马国际透明组织批评。
大马国际透明组织(TI-M)今晚发表文告指出,虽然它尊重联邦宪法第42条所赋赦免权,但这项决定势必重挫马来西亚肃贪倡廉的公信力。
它提醒,联邦法院此前一致维持原判,裁定纳吉挪用4200万令吉罪名成立,刑事罪责确凿。
“此隐忧关乎大局,绝非纳吉一人之事。巨贪重犯若享特权优待,恐加深社会成见,误以为权贵阶层不必承担应有的法律制裁。”
国家元首依布拉欣特赦前首相纳吉,准其缴清5000万令吉罚款后居家服刑,招致大马国际透明组织批评。
大马国际透明组织(TI-M)今晚发表文告指出,虽然它尊重联邦宪法第42条所赋赦免权,但这项决定势必重挫马来西亚肃贪倡廉的公信力。
它提醒,联邦法院此前一致维持原判,裁定纳吉挪用4200万令吉罪名成立,刑事罪责确凿。
“此隐忧关乎大局,绝非纳吉一人之事。巨贪重犯若享特权优待,恐加深社会成见,误以为权贵阶层不必承担应有的法律制裁。”
“不仅如此,此举更可能开立恶例,引致往后特大贪腐与金融罪案纷纷仿效援引,削弱马来西亚反贪机制的威慑力。”
问责不能因人而异
大马国际透明组织进一步表示,今日特赦之举亦损及马来西亚的国际声誉。
“单一决议虽不足以完全左右马来西亚的贪污印象指数(CPI)得分,但该指数综合考量了专家与商界人士对公权机构廉洁程度及体制肃贪力度的评估。”
“重大贪腐问责裁决,势必左右外界的总体观感。马来西亚理当巩固各方对体制廉正的信心,而非动摇‘法律面前人人平等’的公信底线。”
大马国际透明组织强调,肃贪是否具备公信力,关键在于面对位高权重之涉案者时,能否秉持罪刑相当、法权平等的问责原则,毫不动摇。
“国家倾注全力改善治理、重建体制威信,绝不能让指标反贪大案因特权优待而蒙上阴影,导致前功尽弃。”
In old England, the government once imposed a Window Tax: the more windows your house had, the more tax you paid. The people soon discovered a brilliant solution. Brick up the windows. If the government taxed the windows, then there would simply be fewer windows to tax. Eventually, houses stood with sealed-up windows—not because the people wanted dark homes, but because the system had made common sense too expensive. Malaysia seems to have found its own modern version of the Window Tax. Najib was sentenced to prison. But now, the prison can apparently be transformed into a residence—complete with the comfort and privacy of home. Same prisoner. Different walls. Perhaps this is the new Malaysian principle of justice: For ordinary people, the law builds prison walls. For the powerful, perhaps the walls can be moved. The danger is not merely that people become angry over one case. It is what happens when ordinary citizens begin to conclude that justice has two sets of walls—one that cannot be climbed by the rakyat, and another that can apparently be relocated for the powerful. The English eventually rebelled against the logic of the Window Tax. Malaysians may one day ask their own question: If the rules keep changing depending on who is behind the walls, perhaps the problem is not the prisoner—but the system that built the walls.
有人非常想下屆大選連任大位,可是現實可說是沒有希望。於是我們看到那位沒有智慧也沒有戰鬥力的領導人用討好(賄選)方式來爭取勝選。所以給東馬撥款、給人民小恩小惠、 最新一招給納吉回家,希望博得巫統和馬來人的好感。 行動黨最好還是離開這位為了大位選擇忘初衷、丟正義、眛良知的人,他所做的一切有沒有考慮到行動黨的感受和處境,走自己的路才有轉機,否則就是柔佛和森美蘭選舉的下場一樣,難道到了今天,行動黨還體會不到離你們而去的曾經的支持者心境?
举报这则留言
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2023/06/cbb1619d6d90d451247a6ed4339827ff.jpg)

/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2026/07/bc27aa5c49cd3dcd0d9d4f4f29e5df23.jpg)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2024/01/34d7f895037be2c68e9e785cdd5ebc97.jpg)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2026/08/cbc489a1aa4acfe10683ab42ca45c1d7.jpg)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2026/01/c194f08cd70bbf40309f0b1f0f6097bc.jpg)
/file/attachments/orphans/image_952948.png)
/file/attachments/orphans/zahidspeechatumnoagm2026091102_766098.png)
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2023/09/b5c4e2edf5a5dd49f6352fefe013cb4c.jpg)
确定要删除留言?
此后将无法恢复